Skip to content
JudgmentDAVID GITHONGA WANDIMI VS The Republic1 min read

DAVID GITHONGA WANDIMI VS The Republic

High Court at Nyahururu High Court · · Lilian Mutende

1. David Gitonga Wandimi, the Applicant, approached the court through a Notice of Motion seeking to mitigate pursuant to the provisions of Article 50(2)(p) and 160 of the Constitution.

2. The complaint was in regard to the sentence meted out where he was ordered to pay fines for offences per the three counts of obtaining money by false pretence; conspiracy to defraud and personation. And, in addition he was required to compensate the victim.

3. The application was filed on 1 st August, 2025, however the Applicant has never appeared despite production orders issued. This demonstrates lack of interest in the matter.

4. For that reason, the application that has been pending for more than one year be and is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution; with a window for reinstatement if need be.

5. It is so ordered.

HCCR REV. E061 OF 2025 (RUL.) Page 2 of 2
    DAVID GITHONGA WANDIMI VS The Republic DAVID GITHONGA WANDIMI VS The Republic