Skip to content
JudgmentDAN NDOLO NGOLO AND AGGREY KUTAI NGOLO VS CLINTON KYALO MBALUKU AND LEWIS MUSYOKA1 min read

DAN NDOLO NGOLO AND AGGREY KUTAI NGOLO VS CLINTON KYALO MBALUKU AND LEWIS MUSYOKA

High Court at Kisumu High Court · · Alfred Mabeya

'1. I have considered the representations by learned Counsels.
2. According to the Judiciary’s timelines, appeals should be determined within 180 days from the date of admission. This appeal was admitted on 10/3/2025. It had to be determined by 10/9/2025 .
3. It came up for directions on 8/4/2025 when none of the parties appeared. The Court issued a Notice To Show Cause for dismissal.
4. On 23/4/2025 , the parties appeared and directions were given. The Record of Appeal was to be filed within 21 days and submissions exchanged for highlighting on 17/6/2025 .
5. By 17/6/2025 the appellant had not filed the Record of Appeal. Ms. Mokaya learned Counsel for the Appellant gave an explanation whereby the Court granted the appellant 14 days to file and serve the Record of Appeal in default, the appeal to stand dismissed.
6. Once again the Record of Appeal was not filed and the appeal stood dismissed as at 28/6/2025.
7. On 14/7/2025 , Ms. Mokaya once again implored the Court for more time. The Court resuscitated the appeal on condition that thrown away costs of Kshs.7,000/- were paid within 14 days failure of which the dismissal to stand.
8. The Court is being informed that no costs have been paid todate despite reminders by the respondent. The appellant feigns that it was an oversight.
9. Time and again it has been held that parties and their advocates are bound by court directions. That it is an overriding objective of the Civil Procedure Act that parties and their advocated cooperate with Courts for delivery of justice. See Section 1A of the Civil Procedure Act .
10. Failure to file the Record of Appeal once may be an oversight, twice a happenstance but thrice, that amounts to outright disobedience and contemptuous of the Court.
11. This will not be permitted. The appeal stood dismissed as at 28/7/2025 when the appellant failed to obey the order of 14/7/2025 .
12. Accordingly, there is nothing to submit on. The file is marked as closed.
It is so ordered.
'

Details

Delivered
Court rank
High Court
Case type
Civil Appeal

Related decisions

Published for information only — not legal advice. Check the official record before relying on this text. Talk to an advocate