Skip to content

Employment and Labour Relations Court

Employment and Labour Relations Court at Meru ELRC

Meru ELRC · 1 division

Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123

Decisions
52
Earliest
29 July 2024
Most recent
31 July 2026
Filters1Show

8 decisions

JudgmentAbraham Zakayo VS Timaflor Ltd

Abraham Zakayo VS Timaflor Ltd

Employment and Labour Relations Court at Meru ELRCOnesmus Makau

Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtMiscellaneous Applications

The court reviewed a ruling where it adopted a DOSH assessment of Kshs.638,214.05 plus costs and interest. The respondent (judgment debtor) challenged this by seeking to discount Kshs.477,042 from the award, arguing the medical expenses were paid by the employer but not by the respondent. The court found an error on the face of the record because the Replying Affidavit did not show the respondent underwent a second medical examination that reduced the award to Kshs.370,225. The court discounted the disputed sum, ruling that the respondent did not prove payment of the medical expenses, and allowed the motion with each party bearing their own costs.

occupational safety and healthreview of judgmentunjust enrichmentmedical expenses5 min read
JudgmentDavid Guantai Mwambia VS Kenya Power & Lighting Company Ltd

David Guantai Mwambia VS Kenya Power & Lighting Company Ltd

Employment and Labour Relations Court at Meru ELRCOnesmus Makau

Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtMiscellaneous Applications

The court dismissed the respondent's preliminary objection to the applicant's motion seeking to adopt and enforce a Work Injury Benefits Act (WIBA) award made by the Director of Occupational Health and Safety Services (DOSH). The court found jurisdiction to recognize and enforce DOSH awards under section 52(2) of WIBA, citing its authority as the court with jurisdiction over employment and labour relations claims. The court also held that the DOSH/WIBA Form 4, signed by a Senior OSH Officer and stamped by the County OSH Officer, was valid as per section 53 of WIBA, and the respondent failed to challenge or pay the awarded sum of Kshs.16,456,400.64 despite being notified. The court granted the applicant's prayer for costs and interest at court rates.

work injury benefits actenforcement of awardsjurisdictiondosh forms6 min read
JudgmentJeniffer Kinya Simon VS Teachers Service Commission

Jeniffer Kinya Simon VS Teachers Service Commission

Employment and Labour Relations Court at Meru ELRCOnesmus Makau

Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtMiscellaneous Applications

The court dismissed the applicant's motion seeking to adopt the original DOSH assessment of Kshs.7,665,641.74 from 17th March 2022, as the respondent had successfully challenged it under section 51 of the WIBA Act, leading to a re-evaluation that reduced the permanent disability from 80% to 60% and the compensation amount to Kshs.4,834,022.40. The court found the original assessment no longer valid due to the successful objection and subsequent review, and struck out the motion without ordering costs since the respondent had not fully settled the new award. The applicant was free to move the court for further relief.

work injury benefits actpermanent disabilitydosh assessmentcompensation review4 min read
JudgmentMercy Makena Kinoti VS One Acre Fund

Mercy Makena Kinoti VS One Acre Fund

Employment and Labour Relations Court at Meru ELRCOnesmus Makau

Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtMiscellaneous Applications

The court granted the applicant's motion for a declaration that the respondent pay Kshs.642,265.50 compensation as awarded by the Director of Occupational Safety and Health Services, adopted as court judgment, and costs with interest. The court found it had jurisdiction over WIBA matters, the discharge voucher was conditional and not a binding settlement, thus the applicant's claim for the full award was upheld minus the Kshs.101,397 paid under the discharge voucher.

wibacompensationdischarge voucherpermanent incapacity4 min read
JudgmentDavid Guantai Mwambia VS Kenya Power & Lighting Company Ltd

David Guantai Mwambia VS Kenya Power & Lighting Company Ltd

Employment and Labour Relations Court at Meru ELRCOnesmus Makau

Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtMiscellaneous Applications

The court dismissed the respondent's preliminary objection to the applicant's motion for adoption of a Work Injury Benefit Act (WIBA) award. The court held that it has jurisdiction to enforce DOSH awards where the award has not been challenged under section 51 and 52 of WIBA, as the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act confers original jurisdiction over employment disputes. The court found the application not fatally defective because the DOSH award form, though lacking an official stamp, was signed by a Senior Occupational Safety and Health Officer and the omission could be cured by submitting a stamped copy. The court rejected the respondent's arguments that the court lacks jurisdiction or that the award was invalid due to the absence of a DOSH stamp, citing that the form's wording does not require the Director to sign it and that the omission does not affect the validity of the award.

work injury benefit actdirector of safety and healthjurisdictionenforcement of awards4 min read
JudgmentMbogo & Muriuki Advocate VS County Government Of Isiolo

Mbogo & Muriuki Advocate VS County Government Of Isiolo

Employment and Labour Relations Court at Meru ELRCOnesmus Makau

Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtMiscellaneous Applications

The applicant, MBOGO & MURIUKI ADVOCATES, sought judgment against the County Government of Isiolo for taxed costs of Kshs.24,304,693, interest at 14% per annum from taxation date, and costs of the application. The respondent opposed, citing a reference filed 24th January 2025 as a ground to halt the application. The court held the reference time-barred as it was filed 48 days after the taxing officer's decision, and the applicant's application was allowed for judgment on costs with interest and costs of the application.

advocates actcosts certificationtaxing officertime bar4 min read
JudgmentAbraham Zakayo VS Timaflor Ltd

Abraham Zakayo VS Timaflor Ltd

Employment and Labour Relations Court at Meru ELRCOnesmus Makau

Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtMiscellaneous Applications

The court, presided over by Hon. Justice Onesmus N Makau, ruled on an application by Abraham Zakayo (Applicant) against Timafrol Limited (Respondent) seeking enforcement of a Kshs.638,214.05 compensation award from the Director of Occupational Safety and Health Services. The Applicant claimed the Respondent failed to pay the award after being notified, while the Respondent argued it reduced the award to Kshs.370,225.00 via a second medical review and paid it. The court found no evidence of the second medical review or payment, holding the Respondent must pay the original award with interest, costs, and jurisdiction was upheld under the Employment and Labour Relations (ELRC) Act.

employment and labour relationscompensation awardoccupational safety and healthwiba3 min read
JudgmentSimon Mutuma VS China State Construstion Engineering Corp. (k) Ltd

Simon Mutuma VS China State Construstion Engineering Corp. (k) Ltd

Employment and Labour Relations Court at Meru ELRCOnesmus Makau

Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtMiscellaneous Applications

The court allowed the applicant's motion seeking declaration that the respondent pay the compensation award of Kshs201,344.00 by the Director of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH), adoption of the award as court judgment, and costs. The court found jurisdiction under the Employment and Labour Relations (ELRC) Act and determined the applicant was employed by the respondent based on DOSH Form 1 evidence, which authenticated the employment relationship and injury details. The court rejected the respondent's argument that it lacked jurisdiction or that the applicant was not an employee.

employment and labour relationswork injury benefits actdosh form 1employment relationship3 min read