Skip to content
JudgmentCHINA ROAD AND BRIDGE CORPORATION VS PUBLIC PROCUREMENT ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD AND MANAGING DIRECTOR OF KENYA RAILWAYS CORPORATION AND 3 Others2 min read

CHINA ROAD AND BRIDGE CORPORATION VS PUBLIC PROCUREMENT ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD AND MANAGING DIRECTOR OF KENYA RAILWAYS CORPORATION AND 3 Others

High Court at Milimani High Court · · R. E. Aburili

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

MILIMANI LAW COURTS

JUDICIAL REVIEW DIVISION

JUDICIAL REVIEW MISC. APPLICATION NO. E035 OF 2026

CHINA ROAD AND BRIDGE CORPORATION…………………………APPLICANT

VERSUS

PUBLIC PROCUREMENT

ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD.....................................................RESPONDENT

AND

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

KENYA RAILWAYS CORPORATION………………..……1 ST INTERESTED PARTY

KENYA RAILWAYS CORPORATION…………………….2 ND INTERESTED PARTY

CHINA CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION

CORPORATION…………………………………………...….3 RD INTERESTED PARTY

CRCEG-COVEC CONSORTIUM…………………………...3 RD INTERESTED PARTY

RULING

1. I have considered the chamber summons dated 9/3/2026 filed under certificate of urgency. I have also heard the applicant’s Counsel, Mr. Kimani Kiragu, exparte.

2. The applicant seeks leave of court to apply for Judicial Review orders of prohibition, to prohibit the Respondent from hearing and determining or otherwise proceeding with PPARB Application No. 31/2026 and that leave if granted do operate as a stay of further proceedings.

3. In the aforesaid application pending hearing and determination of these proceedings substantively, the applicant seeks to challenge the second request for review which in its view, borders on contempt proceedings. It challenges the Respondents’ jurisdiction.

4. Having considered the application, I am satisfied that the applicant has a prima facie arguable case in challenging jurisdiction of the Respondents to hear a second request for review before it hears and makes a decision on the request. An arguable case is not necessarily one that must succeed, but one which ought to be argued fully before the court; one that is not frivolous or hopeless on the face of it.

5. I grant leave to the applicant to apply for Judicial Review orders of prohibition as sought in prayer 2 of the application dated 9/3/2026. The main motion to be filed and served within 21 days of today. As these proceedings are initiated in a Miscellaneous file, the main motion be filed in a substantive Judicial Review file.

6. I further order that the leave so granted shall operate as stay of any proceedings before the Respondents in PPARB Application for Review No. 31/2026.

7. This file is closed.

Dated, Signed & Delivered virtually at Nairobi this 11 th Day of March, 2026

R.E. ABURILI

JUDGE

2 JR MISC NO. E035 OF 2026 RULING

Details

Delivered
Court rank
High Court

Related decisions

Published for information only — not legal advice. Check the official record before relying on this text. Talk to an advocate