Skip to content
JudgmentBENJAMIN MWAKAVI KAMINDWA VS The Republic3 min read

BENJAMIN MWAKAVI KAMINDWA VS The Republic

High Court at Makueni High Court · · Matheka, Teresia Mumbua


  1. The  application  before  me is the one  brought  under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure  Code. The applicant states that it is : In the matter of: Section  33(2)  of  the Criminal Procedure  Code, Judicial Sentencing   Policy Guidelines  Para  7.10 & 7.11 and case law of Ahamad Abolfathi Mohammed & Another  V  Republic  [2018] eKLR)
  2. He states : 
  3. That  I am seeking  revision  of my sentence  pursuant to  section 333(2) of the Criminal  Procedure  Code. 
  4. That if    prayer  sought above succeeds, I entreat this court for a non-custodial or community based sentence for the remaining time of sentence as enshrined in the probation of offenders Act Cap 64(5)(1)
  5. That, I wish to be present during the hearing of this application.
  6. The application  is supported by the affidavit of Benjamin Mwakavi Kamindwa the applicant sworn on an unknown date in July 2024.
  7. He depones inter alia;
  8. That, the  learned  trial  magistrate erred in law and fact by not considering the period  spent  in remand  custody  as per section 333(2)  of the  Criminal Procedure Code  before  my conviction and sentence  on 18th day of March, 2019.
  9. That , although the learned judge identified it while making determination  but  the same did not reflect in the judgment pursuant to the Judicial Sentencing Policy  Guidelines  para 7.10 & 7.11 and in the  case  law of  Ahamad  Abolifathi Mohammed  &  another  vs  Republic  [2018]eKLR.
  10. That, in the above findings the honourable courts are reminded to consider time spent pendency of the trial by the accused persons.
  11. That I was apprehended to the Hon.Court on 13th day of April, 2017charged, tried, the honourable court made a determination whereby I was found guilty, there after convicted and sentenced on 18th day  of March, 2019.
  12. That, I  the applicant was in remand custody for twenty-three(23) months and five(5) days(one  year, eleven  months & five days) period which  I pray to this honourable court to factor in my sentence.
  13. That, I entreat  this  honourable  court   for non-custodial  or community-based  sentence  for  the remaining time of sentence as enshrined in the Probation of Offenders Act Cap 64 (5)(1).
  14. I asked for the lower court file. 
  15. I found that upon the trial and conviction, the appellant had filed MAKUENI HCCRA 105/2019.
  16. In the judgment the learned Judge observed;

The appellant upon conviction on 18th March 2019  was sentenced to twenty (20) years imprisonment. When asked to mitigate, all he told the court was that he was innocent. Section 8(3) Sexual Offences Act provides for a mandatory minimum sentence of twenty (20) years which was meted out on the appellant.

The record also shows that the appellant first appeared for plea on 13th April 2017 and he was in custody up to the date of conviction and sentence.  It’s not shown whether this factor was considered at the time of sentencing.  I will consider it.

  1. The Judge then proceeded to hold :

The upshot is that the appeal against conviction is dismissed.  The sentence of twenty (20) years is set aside and substituted with a sentence of fifteen (15) years imprisonment from date of conviction.

  1. Evidently the issue was considered by Judge on the first appeal in the judgment delivered on 25/6/2020. 
  2. In the circumstances the application to apply s. 333(2) of the CPC to the applicant’s sentence is untenable, without merit. It is dismissed and the file closed.
  3. The applicant to serve his sentence but has the liberty to file appeal in the Court of Appeal.
  4. The Orders be served upon the Officer in Charge Makueni GK Prison for Compliance.
  5. Orders accordingly.

Dated signed and delivered through CTS this 12th May 2025

Mumbua T Matheka

Judge

CA Chrispol

    BENJAMIN MWAKAVI KAMINDWA VS The Republic BENJAMIN MWAKAVI KAMINDWA VS The Republic