Skip to content
JudgmentB.U.G VS7 min read

B.U.G VS

High Court at Makueni High Court · · Matheka, Teresia Mumbua


1. W.K.G a Kenyan/American, and  B.U.G American , have been married since 17/3/2005.
2. They reside in Sadly   Terrace, Gaithersburg MD in U.S.A.
3. Both   have applied to adopt B.E.M, whose mother W.M.M is a niece   of W..K.G because her father is a brother of W.K.G.
4. B.E.M is 15 years old.
5. The applicants have chosen Christopher    Kiliu Kieti and Consolata Nduku Katiku as the legal guardians of BEM should they be allowed to adopt him. This couple appeared before me   at the hearing   of this cause and confirmed   that they   willingly accepted   to be legal   guardians and understood what it means to take over parental responsibility over the minor should the need arise.
6. BEM, the minor also appeared before me.  I spoke   with him - and he understood that the adoption order would remove parental responsibility from his mother   to    the applicants and he would move to live with them as his adoptive parents.   He also   confirmed that though   he had not met his grand aunt as he referred to the 2nd applicant in person he had been in communication with her and her husband, after whom he is named, over the years    since he became   aware of himself.
7. His mother   W.M.M -   is named after the 2nd applicant who is the sister to her father. She    gave her consent.  It is  was  clear that  the  father  of  the  minor  had  never  been in the life of the minor   and his  whereabouts  were unknown.
8. The parents of W.M.M, the grand parents of BEM - were present in court.  They vouch for     the 2nd    applicant stating that as a sister, they trust her and her husband    to take care of their   grandson and give him the best in life.  These family members confirm that the applicants have over the years given support to the family and more so to the minor and his mother.
9. I have   also considered   all the reports filed by the requisite authorities:   by the county coordinator   children services, Directorate of Children Service Makueni -  where he observed as follows:
a) Bonding:  No physical interaction /bonding with the minor as taken place. However, the child has bonded with the applicants, through various virtual calls, have readily accepted him as one of their own and pay his school fees as well as those of his sisters.  The biological   mother or the minor was not coerced into agreeing or consenting to the adoption.
b) Family support; this adoption enjoys the support of the applicants’ respective families. The 2nd applicant’s cousin, Mr.  Christopher Kiliu Kieti and his wife Mrs. Consolata Nduku Katiku are the legal guardians to the child.  All members of the applicants’ immediate family have agreed and are supportive of the proposed kinship adoption. The   applicants are going    through    their first adoption process.
c) Financial Ability:  The applicants have sufficient   financial means to care for the child.
d) Stable Marriage:  The applicants enjoy a stable marriage of 20 years that has not been affected by their inability to have a biological child after they got married.
He made the following Recommendations
Your Ladyship, the applicants meet all the requirements for foreign adoption as per the Children Act, 2022.
The applicants are financially and emotionally   stable. The applicants have taken care of the minor’s school fees and other financial   needs, and have proved that they are able to take on parental responsibility and custody of the child on a more permanent    basis if the adoption is approved by the court.
The Secretary of Children Services recommends the adoption of the minor   by the applicants and that they be allowed   to name the minor    as BEM
10. I have also considered the report   from Change Trust and    the documents annexed thereto: -
1) Child’s birth certificate serial number 7615846 issued at Machakos   registry showing the date of birth as 7th June 2009 and the parent as WMM birth in Machakos.
2) Consent to Adoption by biological parent, being form of Social Inquiry signed by WMM on 21 August, 2024.
3) Biological   Mother’s   identification   card number 279… WMM.
4) Child’s handwritten consent dated 21 August, 2024.
5) Chief’s letter Kalawani   Location, Moony West Sub county showing that  the  family hails  from the jurisdiction and confirming    the circumstances . The letter is dated 20 May, 2024 acknowledging    the family.
6) Child’s   Medical Report dated 28 May, 2024 at the Tawa Sub-county Hospital.
7) Letter of confirmation of Admission at I… School.
8) Adopters’ application and approval for adoption.
11. Change Trust recommended the applicants for adoption as adoptive parents.
12. Its Committee sitting on the 2 September, 2024, reviewed the child’s dossier and was satisfied that the child is free for adoption and issued the Certificate to Declare a Child Free For Adoption with respect to BEM.
13. The  applicants  testified  in  court  (virtually)  &  told  the court  that  the decision   to adopt   BEM was  made  when he  was a baby. That   he was named after the 1st applicant. The  2nd    applicant   testified   that  she  and her  husband  were  ready  to  parent BEM,  and  continue  to provide the  support  they had   provided  for  him  all  along. That  they  have   a home, and  the  resources  t do so  -  and  to  care and love  him as  their  own.
They have provided evidence of   their   good standing both financially and socially.
In addition they have other family within where they live and where the minor will interact with his and relatives who live in the USA. The example being the legal guardians who have children.
14. From what has been presented before me the only issue for determination is whether the  applicant’s O S dated 26th July 2024 is tenable. The applicable law  is the Children Act, 2022
15. I note that the Children officer describes this adoption as both foreign and kinship, Can it be both?
16. S 183(4) (c)  of the Children Act, 2022 describes a "foreign adoption" to mean an adoption in relation to which —
a.  (i) the adopting parent or parents are Kenyan nationals with dual citizenship;
b.  (ii) the adopting parent or parents are foreign nationals whether or not resident in Kenya; the adopting parent or
c. (iii) parents are not Kenyan nationals but are biologically related to the child
d. (iv); or the adopting parent or parents were once Kenyan nationals but have lost their nationality by operation of the law of the host country to which the prospective parent or parents have a nationality
17. S. 186 (6) states
The Court shall not make an adoption order in favour of an applicant or joint applicants if the applicant or joint applicants, or any of them—
(a) is of unsound mind within the meaning of the Mental Health Act (Cap. 248);
(b) is incapable of exercising proper care and guardianship of a child;
(c) has been convicted by a Court of competent jurisdiction for any of the offences specified in the Third Schedule or similar offences; (d) in the case of joint applicants, if the applicants are not married to each other;
(e) is a sole male applicant except where the applicant is a biological relative of the child; or
(f) is a foreign applicant except where the applicant is a biological relative of the child.
18. This appears to resonate with what is defined as kinship adoption under s. 2 of the Act as the adoption of a child by a person who is a relative of the child
19. S. 193(1).states that
A kinship adoption order may only be made in favour of a relative of the child
20. S. 2 of the Act defines a "relative" to mean
(a) in relation to a child, any person related to the child, whether of the full blood, half blood or by affinity and, where an adoption order has been made in respect of the child or any other person under this Act, any person who would be a relative of the child within the meaning of this definition if the adopted person was the child of the adopter born inside marriage; and
(b) for the purpose of adoption, a mother, father, brother or half brother, sister or half-sister, maternal or paternal uncle or aunt or grandparent or step-parent of a child;
21. Both applicants hold American citizenship. The 2nd applicant’s certificate of naturalization was issued on 13th March 2024. Legally that places them in the category of foreigners: adoptive parents who are not Kenyan nationals but are biologically related to the child
22. The   2nd applicant is a sister to the grandfather of BEM. That makes her a grandmother to the child as well. The letter from the chief further confirms this position,
23. Hence these applicants fall within the exceptions to the limitations against foreign adoptions because the 2nd applicant is biologically related to the child bringing this foreign adoption into the domain of the kinship adoption.
24. The    Adoptive parents have complied    with all the other legal requirements and come highly recommended by the family    as suitable parents.
25. In the circumstances   their Originating Summons dated 26/7/2025 be and is hereby allowed  in the following terms:
a. The applicants B.U.G and W.K.G be and are hereby authorized to jointly adopt    the minor B.EM.
b. Christopher Kiliu Kieti and Consolata Nduku Katiku be and are hereby   appointed   as the legal guardians of BEM
c. The Registrar General     be and is hereby directed to    make    in the Adoption Children Register an entry recording   the Adoption in accordance with the particulars set out in the schedule   annexed   hereto containing the full particulars of the minor and the adoptive parents.
d. The guardian ad litem be and is   hereby   discharged.
27. There is no orders    as to    costs.
Dated, signed and delivered via CTS with consent of counsel this
9th April 2025
Mumbua T Matheka
Judge
Court Assistant: Chrispol
    B.U.G VS B.U.G VS | Wakili Link