Skip to content
JudgmentAssets Recovery Agency VS ADAN ABDOW ALIO AND ABDUBA GUYO ALI1 min read

Assets Recovery Agency VS ADAN ABDOW ALIO AND ABDUBA GUYO ALI

High Court at Milimani High Court · · E.N. Maina


I have seen the Affidavit of Service.  The Respondents were duly served by way of substituted service but to date they have not entered appearance to oppose the ARA/Applicant’s Originating Motion dated 22nd April 2024 which seeks forfeiture of a truck and trailer belonging to them.  Section 95 of the POCAMLA gives this court power to enter a default judgment where the Respondent does not appear.  Accordingly, a default judgment is hereby entered for the ARA/Applicant against the Respondents as prayed in the Originating Motion.
Orders accordingly.

    Assets Recovery Agency VS ADAN ABDOW ALIO AND ABDUBA GUYO ALI Assets Recovery Agency VS ADAN ABDOW ALIO AND ABDUBA GUYO ALI